Tue. Mar 18th, 2025
alert-–-how-does-your-town-rank-in-benefits-britain?-almost-two-thirds-of-households-are-claiming-universal-credit-in-some-parts-of-the-country-–-as-labour-mps-revolt-over-plan-for-cutsAlert – How does YOUR town rank in Benefits Britain? Almost TWO-THIRDS of households are claiming Universal Credit in some parts of the country – as Labour MPs revolt over plan for cuts

Almost two-thirds of households part of the UK are claiming Universal Credit, a new map reveals amid a furious government row over benefit rates.

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall unveiled fresh curbs on handouts this afternoon despite opposition inside Cabinet and in the wider Labour Party.

The Government wants to axe the growing cost of people going on the sick, which hit £48 billion in 2023-24 and is forecast to continue rising to £67 billion in 2029-30.

Some 64.2 per cent of households in the Perry Bar constituency, in Birmingham, are claiming benefits, more than twice the UK average of 25.2 per cent.

It is the area of the UK with the highest rate of household claims, according to data from the House of Commons Library.

Four out of the five areas with the highest household claimant counts are in Birmingham, with all of the top 10 being found in the Midlands city, London, or Bradford.

In the eight constituencies with the most household claimants, more than half were receiving Universal Credit. 

You can use the interactive map below to find out what the rate is where you live. 

Ms Kendall told the Commons: ‘The facts speak for themselves: one in 10 people of working age now claiming a sickness or disability benefit, almost one million young people not in education, employment or training – that’s one in eight of all our young people.

‘2.8 million out of work due to long-term sickness, and the number of people claiming personal independence payments set to double this decade from two to 4.3 million, with the growth in claims rising faster among young people, and mental health conditions.

‘And with claims up to four times higher in parts of the Midlands, Wales and the North, where economic demand is weakest. 

‘Places that were decimated in the 80s and 90s, written-off for years by successive Tory governments and never given the chances they deserve.’

The proportion of personal independence payments claimants in England and Wales who are under the age of 30 has increased in recent years, from 14.5 per cent of the total in January 2020 to 16.4 per cent in January 2025.

People aged 30-44 made up 18.8 per cent of the total in January 2020 and 20.9 per cent in January 2025.

By contrast, the proportion of claimants who are aged 45-59 has fallen from 36.3 per cent in January 2020 to 30.1 per cent in January 2025, while the figure for 60 to 74-year-olds is broadly unchanged, rising very slightly from 30.5 per cent to 30.9 per cent.

One of Sir Keir Starmer’s closest allies said the Cabinet is united behind efforts to slash the welfare bill.

Pat McFadden, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and a key figure behind the scenes in the Starmer administration, insisted the plans were ‘entirely in line with the values of the Labour Party’.

Ahead of Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall’s announcement, MPs on Labour’s left and the party’s trade union backers hit out at the measures, arguing they would punish the disabled and the poor.

Reports have suggested there is also unease around the Cabinet table, with ministers including Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said to have voiced concerns in private.

But Mr McFadden said: ‘I believe the Cabinet is united behind taking on the issue of the growing benefits bill.’

He told Times Radio the current system ‘leaves too many people in a permanent state of dependence on benefits without the opportunity of work’.

Ministers insist that reform is necessary, given the number of people in England and Wales claiming either sickness or disability benefit has soared from 2.8 million to about 4.0 million since 2019.

The Government hopes to save up to £6 billion from the bill as Chancellor Rachel Reeves struggles to balance the books in the face of weak economic growth and mounting debt interest costs.

The most controversial element of the package could be changes to the personal independence payment (PIP) – a benefit aimed at helping the disabled with the increased cost of living associated with their conditions.

PIP is not means-tested and is available to people even if they are working.

The Government appears to have shifted away from rumoured plans to freeze PIP, meaning a real-terms cut by not increasing the payments in line with inflation, but it will be harder to qualify for in future.

That could include more frequent reassessments for both PIP and incapacity benefits to determine whether the payments are maintained.

Mr McFadden said: ‘Reassessments will be part of the package announced today.

‘We want people, if they’re on long-term sickness benefits, not to languish there forever, but to be reassessed.

‘There have been too few reassessments in recent years.’

But he suggested people with degenerative illnesses or permanent disabilities would be treated differently to those who might have a temporary condition which would allow them to be supported into work.

A series of Labour MPs have already hit out at the plans despite intensive efforts by No 10 to persuade them of the need for change.

Nadia Whittome said she was ‘gravely concerned by the reforms’ reportedly being considered and ‘frankly horrified’ by comments from some ministers, while veteran MP Diane Abbott said there was a ‘chasm’ between ‘a tiny number of people at the top’ and the overwhelming majority of MPs and party members.

Labour Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham warned that changes to eligibility and support while leaving the system as it is would ‘trap too many people in poverty’.

Unite’s general secretary Sharon Graham wrote in the Mirror ‘we are putting the poorest against the poorest’, while Unison’s Christina McAnea said: ‘Hitting those least able to speak up for themselves is never acceptable.’

error: Content is protected !!